Reuters: U.S.

Tuesday, February 15, 2022

Overnight Health Care — Biden eyes additional COVID-19 funding

View in your browser

OVERNIGHT POLICY:
Health Care

 

Biden eyes additional COVID-19 funding

© Associated Press/Alex Brandon

Welcome to Tuesday's Overnight Health Care, where we’re following the latest moves on policy and news affecting your health. Subscribe here: thehill.com/newsletter-signup

Just a day after D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) announced she was ending the vaccine requirement for businesses before it even fully took effect, a member of the City Council is drafting a bill to reinstate it.

The Biden administration wants $30 billion in supplemental COVID-19 funding, though the appetite in Congress for spending money is mixed at best.

For The Hill, we’re Peter Sullivan (psullivan@thehill.com) and Nathaniel Weixel (nweixel@thehill.com). Write to us with tips and feedback, and follow us on Twitter: @PeterSullivan4 and @NateWeixel.

Let’s get started.

 

Biden officials eye $30 billion in COVID money

Xavier Becerra

© Getty Images

The Biden administration signaled it will request $30 billion in supplemental COVID-19 funding during discussions with Congress on Tuesday, including money for vaccines, testing and treatment.  

The discussions come ahead of a March 11 deadline for a government funding package, which could serve as a vehicle for more COVID-19 funds. 

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) told reporters he spoke to Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday and is expecting a $30 billion request. 

"I talked to Secretary Becerra today, and I think they're going to be proposing a $30 billion supplemental," Blunt said, according to audio provided by his office. 

What’s the money for? An HHS spokesperson confirmed the discussions, saying agency leaders "discussed the status of COVID response funds as well as the need for additional resources to support securing more life-saving treatments and vaccines, sustaining testing capacity, and investing in research and development of next-generation vaccines." 

Some GOP resistance: Some congressional Republicans have expressed opposition to more funding, though, pointing to the billions already allocated. 

"It is ridiculous to think that Congress should go along with such a request," Rep. Jason Smith (Mo.), the top Republican on the House Budget Committee, wrote in a Fox News op-ed last week. "The Administration’s own trail of inflationary fueled spending over the last year has hardly emboldened Americans’ confidence that government is a good steward of their tax dollars." 

Read more here.

 

FDA finally gets permanent commissioner

Robert Califf

© Getty Images

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a new permanent leader for the first time in over a year after the Senate on Tuesday narrowly confirmed Robert Califf.

Califf was confirmed in a vote of 50-46, with Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) voting "present." Rounds "paired" his vote to offset the absence of Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), who is recovering after suffering a stroke. 

The close vote reflected unexpected opposition from both Democrats and Republicans, as the nomination was roiled with debate about abortion and opioids.

Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Ed Markey (Mass.), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.) and Maggie Hassan (N.H.), and Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.), who caucuses with Democrats, voted against him, as well as almost all Republicans. 

Democrats were critical of Califf's ties to the pharmaceutical industry, as well as the FDA’s record on opioid approvals. 

The razor-thin margin was evident Monday, when Democrats were able to shut down debate on the nomination, 49-45, because five Republicans were missing from the vote. 

Ultimately, Califf picked up six Republicans on Tuesday to balance out the Democratic defections: Sens. Roy Blunt (Mo.), Richard Burr (N.C.), Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Mitt Romney (Utah) and Patrick Toomey (Pa.). 

Read more here. 

 

SCIENTISTS SAY FIRST WOMAN APPARENTLY CURED OF HIV WITH NEW TREATMENT

Scientists announced Tuesday that the first woman appears to be cured of HIV using a cutting-edge stem cell transplant method. 

According to the National Institutes of Health, this is the third known case of HIV remission in an individual who received a stem cell transplant. The results suggest that cord stem cell transplantation should be considered to achieve HIV remission and cure for people living with HIV, so long as they require such a transplant for other diseases, according to the study team. 

The treatment used stem cells from umbilical cord blood, which is more widely available than adult stem cells used in bone marrow transplants. 

According to the study, a woman who had been taking antiretroviral drugs for HIV for four years was diagnosed with leukemia, which then went into remission after chemotherapy.  

In 2017, she received a transplant of cord blood stem cells supplemented with adult donor cells from a relative. After waiting 100 days, she received 100 percent cord blood, and at that point had no detectable HIV.  

At 37 months post-transplant, the patient ceased HIV treatment, and according to the study, no HIV was detected in the participant for 14 months 

But in an interview with the Conversations on Healthcare podcast, White House medical advisor and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Anthony Fauci was guarded about the implications for the future. 

“I don’t want people to think that now this is something that can applied to the 36 million people living with HIV,” Fauci said, because the procedure isn’t really an option for anyone who doesn’t already need treatment for a condition outside of HIV.

“This is much more of a proof of concept, that one can actually get the virus out and be suppressed for a long period of time. It is not practical to think this is something that will be widely available," he said.

 

LONG COVID-19 LESS LIKELY IN VACCINATED, UK HEALTH AGENCY SAYS

The United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA) on Tuesday released a new review of 15 studies finding that "long COVID-19" — COVID-19 symptoms that develop after acute coronavirus infection — is less likely to affect those who have been vaccinated against the virus. 

According to the review, the UKHSA concluded that people who have received at least two doses of the Moderna, Pfizer or AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines or one dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine are half as likely to get long COVID-19 compared to their unvaccinated counterparts, Reuters reported

"These studies add to the potential benefits of receiving a full course of the COVID-19 vaccination," Mary Ramsay, head of immunization at UKHSA, reportedly said. "Vaccination is the best way to protect yourself from serious symptoms when you get infected and may also help to reduce the longer-term impact." 

Four studies connected to the review compared the symptoms of people before and after vaccination. 

Three other studies revealed that after vaccination, participants reported improvements in their long COVID-19 symptoms as opposed to the symptoms worsening, the news outlet noted. 

Read more here.  

 

STAY UP TO DATE

The Hill’s new Evening Report ensures you’re covered morning, noon, and night with an essential digest of what’s happening in Washington. Sign up here.

 

CDC: Pregnancy vax can help protect infant

© LWA/Dann Tardif

A study released Tuesday finds new evidence that a parent getting vaccinated against COVID-19 while pregnant can help protect the infant against the virus.   

The study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that vaccination with two doses of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines during pregnancy was 61 percent effective in protecting infants from hospitalization with COVID-19.   

“Maternal vaccination is a really important way to help protect young infants,” Dana Meaney-Delman, a CDC researcher, told reporters.   

Vaccination during pregnancy is important “both to help protect the people who are pregnant and to help protect their babies,” she added.   

The new findings bolster the CDC’s ongoing push for more pregnant people to get vaccinated, with the agency saying there are no side effects that should deter people from getting the vaccine during pregnancy.   

The study found that vaccination provided more protection for the infant if administered later in pregnancy, but the CDC emphasized that pregnant people should get the vaccine as soon as possible.   

The data used in the study came from 20 pediatric hospitals in 17 states, from July 2021 to January 2022. 

Read more here.

 

WHAT WE'RE READING

  • Novak Djokovic says he will skip tournaments rather than get the COVID vaccine (NPR
  • Canada eases Covid-19 testing rules for vaccinated travelers (CNN)  
  • Altria says judge has dismissed lawsuit over Juul investment (AP)
 

STATE BY STATE

  • Why Colorado hospitals will still see capacity issues even as COVID wanes (Fox 31)  
  • South Dakota House OKs bill saying parasite-killing drug can be prescribed to humans (Grand Forks Herald) 
  • As pandemic continues, COVID-19 precautions fade at Georgia Capitol (Atlanta Journal Constitution)
 

That's it for today, thanks for reading. Check out The Hill's health care page for the latest news and coverage. See you Wednesday.

 
Sign Up for Health Care
Forward Health Care
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Privacy Policy  |   Manage Subscriptions  |   Unsubscribe
Email to a friend  |   Sign Up for Other Newsletters

The Hill 1625 K Street, NW 9th Floor, Washington DC 20006
© 1998 - 2022 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved. Nexstar Logo
Link

No comments:

Post a Comment