Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) imperiled the Build Back Better Act on Sunday, putting President Biden’s top domestic priority on its deathbed while leaving fellow Democrats to question if there can be a separate path forward for any of the legislation’s provisions. Manchi delivered a stinging rebuke of the Biden administration after months of work on the nearly $2 trillion package, which he has criticized and questioned repeatedly as inflation has surged and as his party has seemingly looked past him in negotiations. “I cannot vote to continue with this piece of legislation, I just can't. I tried everything humanly possible, I can't get there,” Manchin told “Fox News Sunday” guest host Bret Baier. “This is a no on this legislation. … I have tried everything I know to do.” “When you have these things coming at you the way they are right now — I’ve always said … if I can’t go home to the people of West Virginia, I can’t vote for it,” Manchin added (The Hill). Heads up? The news dropped like a bomb at the White House, which reportedly received word of Manchin’s stance shortly before his Sunday show appearance, with one of his staffers informing a Biden aide. It also led to one of the most biting statements the Biden White House has released since the president took office, a 700-word screed essentially accusing the West Virginia centrist of lying to Biden this week before an about-face. White House press secretary Jen Psaki said that Manchin delivered an outline for the package to the White House last week and “promised to continue conversations in the days ahead” (The Hill). “If his comments on FOX and written statement indicate an end to that effort, they represent a sudden and inexplicable reversal in his position, and a breach of his commitments to the President and the Senator’s colleagues in the House and Senate,” Psaki said. “Just as Senator Manchin reversed his position on Build Back Better this morning, we will continue to press him to see if he will reverse his position yet again, to honor his prior commitments and be true to his word.” Despite the fire-and-brimstone statement, Manchin’s warnings to Biden and party leaders had been clear to them since at least the summer. Month after month, the Senate Democrat described his reservations about rising inflation and federal debt as concerns. At one point, Senate Democrats mocked him for mentioning the latter issue during a conference luncheon in late July. Less than two months ago, Manchin told Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) that he was “comfortable” passing nothing when the price point of the bill was hovering in the range of $2 trillion to $3.5 trillion, going so far as to make a zero with his thumb and index finger to illustrate his point (Axios). Alexander Bolton, The Hill: Manchin undercuts Biden, leaving his agenda in limbo. Politico: White House lights up Manchin after he crushes Biden's megabill. The Washington Post: From charm offensive to scorched earth: How Biden’s fragile alliance with Manchin unraveled. Bloomberg News: Goldman Sachs Group Inc. lowered its forecast for U.S. economic growth after Manchin said Sunday he won’t support the $2 trillion tax-and-spending plan. Perhaps the only people more upset by Manchin’s opposition were House progressives. Some said they felt betrayed by the centrist Democrat and were left seething. They were also ready and waiting to deliver a message of their own to party leaders: We told you so. The group, which included Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), notably voted against the bipartisan infrastructure package last month, arguing it was a mistake to do so without passing the massive social spending and climate bill in tandem. “Let’s be clear: Manchin’s excuse is bullshit. The people of West Virginia would directly benefit from childcare, pre-Medicare expansion, and long term care, just like Minnesotans,” Omar said. “This is exactly what we warned would happen if we separated Build Back Better from infrastructure.” The Hill: Sanders: Let Manchin vote no on Build Back Better “in front of the whole world.” Jim Tankersley, The New York Times: Biden agenda sinks under its own ambitions. © Associated Press/J. Scott Applewhite With Manchin’s opposition clear, the question on the minds of Democrats everywhere is, what now? Outwardly, the White House indicated support for an approach laid out by the New Democrat Coalition calling for a bill with fewer provisions funded for longer periods of budgetary commitment. “We believe that adopting such an approach could open a potential path forward for this legislation,” Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), the chairwoman of the coalition, said in a statement, which was quickly shared on social media by White House chief of staff Ron Klain. In a letter to Senate Democrats early this morning, Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) maintained that the party will not give up in the new year and will still attempt to pass something. What that looks like, however, remains up in the air. “We were elected to address these many needs and we will not stop fighting until we do. Therefore, Senators should be aware that the Senate will, in fact, consider the Build Back Better Act, very early in the new year so that every Member of this body has the opportunity to make their position known on the Senate floor, not just on television,” Schumer wrote. “We are going to vote on a revised version of the House-passed Build Back Better Act -– and we will keep voting on it until we get something done.” Democrats, including Colorado Gov. Jared Polis and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, say it would be beneficial to salvage some key pieces of the bill, including universal pre-kindergarten and the child tax credit — a key sticking point for Manchin — budgeted over 10 years. “We will be able to pass components of it, it may need to take a different format, but it's not dead,” Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-Mass.) said on Sunday. “This version of it is stalled out. … This package was the best format to getting it done in 2021 and indeed we got it passed in the House of Representatives. We may need to take a different tact in 2022.” Jordain Carney, The Hill: Biden's unending dilemma: dealing with Joe Manchin. The Wall Street Journal: Biden’s climate plans thrown into doubt by Manchin’s rejection of “Build Back Better” bill. NBC News: Democrats plot next steps after Manchin knifes Biden's Build Back Better Act. > Jan. 6: The House’s attempt to hold former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in contempt has created a dilemma for the Department of Justice as it weighs whether to break from long-standing executive branch policy. As The Hill’s Rebecca Beitsch and Harper Neidig point out, the department’s stance for decades has been to support testimonial immunity for top presidential advisers when faced with congressional subpoenas -– the very policy Meadows’s attorneys are relying on. Charging Meadows with contempt for subpoena defiance of the House select committee’s investigation of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol would represent a departure from that trend and create questions for the department looking ahead. The Hill: What we've learned from the Meadows documents. > RIP: Former Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) died Sunday at age 76, having retired from the upper chamber in late 2019 due to declining health and his battle with Parkinson’s disease. Isakson was known across the Capitol complex during his two-decade tenure in office for his kindness, decency and ability to work across the aisle. (The Hill and The Atlanta Journal-Constitution). “If all Republicans were like Johnny,” former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes (D) once said, “I would be a Republican.” Isakson’s motto said it all: “There are two types of people in this world: friends and future friends.” Jim Galloway, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution: Johnny Isakson’s political career was once dead and finished. And then it wasn’t. © Associated Press/J. Scott Applewhite |
No comments:
Post a Comment