INVESTIGATIONS: ***RED ALERT LAWSUIT*** While conservatives were celebrating the FBI getting put through the ringer, New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood (D) dropped a bombshell lawsuit on the president and his family. The Memo: Trump’s legal troubles pile up despite IG report’s release. The lawsuit alleges that Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump used their family’s charitable foundation as a slush fund for 2016 campaign cash. Underwood is seeking $2.8 million in restitution. That’s how much she says the Trump family raised for the Trump Foundation and then used for personal, business or campaign expenses. The state attorney general also forwarded the matter to the IRS and the Federal Election Commission to review whether any crimes were committed. “The Trump Foundation was little more than a checkbook for payments from Mr. Trump or his businesses to nonprofits, regardless of their purpose or legality. This is not how private foundations should function and my office intends to hold the Foundation and its directors accountable for its misuse of charitable assets.” – Underwood. The president lashed out at the lawsuit over Twitter, linking the investigation to former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who resigned last month after accusations from several women that he beat them up. © Twitter/Trump © Screenshot/Trump But the new lawsuit holds genuine legal peril for the president and his family. The Hill: Five things to know about the lawsuit against the Trump Foundation. Speaking of legal peril… Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen’s lawyers have left him. He is reportedly eager to cooperate with federal investigators. And now The Wall Street Journal has a deep dive into the allegations against him. The report says that federal prosecutors are looking into whether Cohen illegally lobbied domestic and foreign companies by promising access to the president and his inner circle. The FBI raided Cohen’s office and personal residences earlier this year and Trump’s lawyers have been trying to limit what they can review, claiming attorney-client privilege. It’s another case in which the president has a lot of legal exposure. The New Yorker: What could Cohen tell Mueller? Meanwhile, New York’s highest court ruled Thursday that a defamation lawsuit brought against Trump by a former contestant on “The Apprentice” can proceed (The Hill). Some believe this case might be the most dangerous of all for Trump, as he’ll likely have to answer questions about it under oath. **** CONGRESS: Next week’s headline-grabbing legislative action will be House consideration of competing immigration bills, both of which the White House says it supports, and neither of which is likely to find liftoff in the Senate. House GOP – immigration: The Hill: House Republicans on Thursday released the text of an immigration measure intended to be a compromise between centrists and conservatives, to be voted on next week. It would allow immigrants covered by the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program to remain in the country, while advancing the president’s border security initiatives, including more funding for a wall on the Mexican border. The upshot? Few lawmakers are coming out to support the compromise (The Hill). > House GOP compromise immigration measure would bar the separation of migrant families (NBC News). House – immigration/family separations: The Hill: Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said, following weeks of relative silence, that he dislikes separating children from their parents when they arrive at the U.S. border, part of the Department of Justice’s “zero tolerance” enforcement policy for illegal immigration. Ryan blamed the separations, which have sparked bipartisan criticism and emotional news coverage, on the courts. > House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) dismissed the prospect that GOP lawmakers may move to change immigration law this year to end the administration’s separation of migrant families, arguing that if Republicans objected to the policy, the administration could halt it immediately (The Hill). House – media shield law: The Hill: The former chairman of the conservative Freedom Caucus endorsed a federal “shield” law for the news media, following the Justice Department’s controversial seizure of phone and email records tied to a New York Times journalist. The communications information was secretly obtained going back to the journalist’s college years as part of the department’s hunt to identify and prosecute government leakers. Senate – marijuana protection: The Hill: The Senate Appropriations Committee approved a measure that would protect medical cannabis operations. The language, which was part of the Senate commerce, justice and science appropriations bill, would block the Justice Department from targeting either users or providers of medical cannabis in states where marijuana use and sales are legal. House Dem leadership: The Hill: Minority Leader Pelosi continues to be a controversial figure among some candidates in her own party. This week, New York Rep. Brian Higgins echoed some fellow Democrats in vowing not to back the California liberal to be Speaker, should Democrats win control of the House next year. Higgins said he wants to see a more cohesive party agenda, and he faulted Pelosi for inaction on Medicare changes and infrastructure legislation this year. |
No comments:
Post a Comment