|
View in your browser |
|
|
|
|
With Build Back Better, Dems aim to correct messaging missteps | By Scott Wong and Mike Lillis | | | House Democrats acknowledge they weren't very effective at selling their $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief plan to the general public. Now, they're hoping to improve on those mistakes with their mammoth climate and social spending package.
While President Biden's Build Back Better Act still has a tough road in the Senate, House Democrats have already begun holding a series of roundtable discussions, site visits, in-person and virtual town halls and news conferences across the country highlighting individual pieces of the roughly $2 trillion package. | Read the full story here | | | | | |
|
|
Lobbyists turn to infrastructure law's implementation | By Karl Evers-Hillstrom | | The $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill is enshrined into law, but the lobbying over its implementation is just getting started.
The spending package, which aims to rebuild roads, bridges and rail and expand broadband and clean drinking water, gives federal agencies broad powers to craft key policies. That opens up an opportunity for industry lobbyists to fight provisions they unsuccessfully urged Congress to strip from the final bill — as well as scramble over how and where billions of federal dollars will be spent. | Read the full story here | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How a biased filibuster hurts Democrats more than Republicans | By Jonathan Gould and David Pozen | | OPINION | Democrats are divided over what to do with the filibuster. Proponents of reform emphasize that the Senate cloture rule is frustrating the party’s ambitions on voting rights, climate change and more. Opponents worry that eliminating the filibuster will come back to bite when Republicans regain control of the Senate and, more generally, that it will further degrade congressional norms of cooperation and forbearance.
The standard case against filibuster reform has some force — Democrats paid a price during the Trump administration for their Obama-era decision to abolish the filibuster for lower-court judgeships — but it misses an important asymmetry between the two major political parties. | Read the full story here | | | | | |
Democrats want to rescue union pensions from the party's failed bailout plan | By Aharon Friedman | | OPINION | Democrats now assert their bailout of multiemployer union pension plans in March’s American Rescue Plan Act was deeply flawed and are demanding the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) rescue multiemployer union pension plans from the act’s botched rescue. Democrats’ admission this bailout will cost much more than advertised should raise concerns about the real costs of the third massive bill they are rushing to enact this year with new social spending schemes. | Read the full story here | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment