CONGRESS: Senate Republicans are taking a wait-and-see approach after the White House released a proposal to expand background checks, one that isn’t considered a final product by any means. As the president withholds support, lawmakers are in the dark about what he’ll eventually back. The proposal, which is a version of the 2013 bill sponsored by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), arrived early Wednesday and has been treated as a trial balloon by members, many of whom reacted cautiously. “There are some ideas floating around that different members of the administration are coming up with, and at this point it’s probably too early to say” if Republicans will support it, said Sen. John Thune (S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican. “Our members are going to be very — proceed with caution — very skeptical of some of the ideas that have been put out there in the past, but I think they’re willing to listen.” According to Toomey, the blueprint was drafted by Attorney General William Barr, who has been on Capitol Hill for the last two days meeting with lawmakers about gun violence and the proposal (The Hill). The memo floats the idea of conducting background checks for all commercial sales through a federally licensed firearms dealer or a newly created class of licensed transfer agents. However, among Senate Republicans, the main question continues to crop up: What will Trump support, and will he support this proposal? The answer could make or break negotiations. "My question to the attorney general ... was what is the president going to support? What is the president going to put forward?” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said, adding that he needs to “evaluate” the proposal. "I need to evaluate it. It's more sort of a, I don't want to say thought experiment ... but it's more in the way that here's some ideas that one could turn into a concrete proposal” (The Hill). Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on his return to Washington that he has not seen the document, but called the proposal a “series of concepts.” “We’re looking at many different things … [W]e’re throwing out many different ideas to Republicans and Democrats, see where they all come out. And that was the document you were talking — I haven’t seen that document,” Trump said. “But we’re throwing a lot of ideas out, but we’re always going to be watching extremely closely the second amendment.” “And about a week ago we asked Bill [Barr] to get involved, and those are ideas that we’re talking to Republicans, Democrats, everybody about. Some they like, some they don’t like,” Trump said. “Just a series of concepts.” The Washington Post: Trump administration plan on gun background checks draws NRA opposition. © Getty Images > Funding fiasco: Spending talks hit another setback on Wednesday amid an entrenched fight over funding for the president’s border wall as Senate Democrats blocked a bill to fund most of the federal government with 11 days left before the Sept. 30 deadline to avoid a shutdown. Senators voted 51-44 on taking up a House-passed bill that was expected to be the vehicle for any Senate funding action. The bill needed 60 votes to pass. Republicans tried to pressure Democrats into supporting the measure ahead of the failed vote Wednesday. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) accused Democrats of also sinking defense legislation over an immigration fight with Trump. “We’ve seen our Democratic colleagues suggest that they may try to shoehorn their long-standing disagreements with President Trump into this appropriations process even though we all agreed not to insist on poison pills,” McConnell said. Across the halls of Congress, House Democrats filed legislation for a stopgap spending bill that would extend government funding until Nov. 21, with a floor vote on the measure expected today. “While the House did its work, the Senate appropriations process is far behind. Because of this delay, we must pass a continuing resolution to avoid another government shutdown,” House Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) said. The final measure included a Democratic demand that the Department of Agriculture report to Congress about the effects of the trade war on farmers, as well as a package of health-related extenders (The Hill). > Impeachment: House Democrats are struggling to defend their impeachment strategy as the rift between Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) widens. A day after Corey Lewandowski testified before the panel, House Democrats on Wednesday offered mixed reviews his appearance which quickly devolved into chaos as the former top Trump aide refused to answer most questions about his role in the president’s alleged efforts to obstruct the investigation of former special counsel Robert Mueller. Some lawmakers made clear their disappointment with his testimony, headlined by Pelosi, who reportedly told lawmakers that Lewandowski should have been held in contempt “then and there,” according to Politico. Others echoed the speaker and believed it went poorly. “If our objective is to draw out facts and shape the narrative for the American people, that wasn’t a great way to start,” said Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), a supporter of impeachment (The Hill). The Washington Post: House Democrats eager to impeach Trump struggle to galvanize public support. > Intel: Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson is expected to appear before the House Intelligence Committee in a classified session closed to the public on Thursday as the committee seeks information about a whistleblower complaint involving communications between Trump and a foreign leader, reportedly by phone, about an unspecified topic. According to The Washington Post, the complaint has triggered a battle between the intelligence community and Congress, with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) pushing intelligence officials to reveal details about the whistleblower complaint. While Atkinson determined the complaint to be credible and troubling enough to be considered a matter of “urgent concern,” a legal threshold that ordinarily requires notification of congressional oversight committees, Joseph Maguire, the acting director of national intelligence, has refused to share details of the communications with lawmakers. This has set off accusations that Maguire is “improperly protecting the president improperly,” according to the Post. |
No comments:
Post a Comment