Views & Opinions |
Views & Opinions |
|
|
As NATO leaders gather to mark the alliance's 75th anniversary, they must resist "repeating the tired mantra that we will help Ukraine 'for as long as it takes,'" writes the Brookings Institution's Michael O'Hanlon. "That is not a strategy." |
(Photo by Roman Pilipey/Getty Images) |
The momentum in the war is on Russia's side, O'Hanlon writes, and the Biden administration has shown "no clarity at all on where we are now heading." O'Hanlon believes NATO should ensure Ukraine's survival and sovereignty. Otherwise, "NATO territory might have been next in the sights of the Russian dictator." That said, "it is not so obvious that Western security hinges on Ukraine reclaiming the 18 percent of its original (pre-2014) territory that Russia currently holds." O'Hanlon thinks the best strategy is to give Ukraine almost all that it asks for into 2025, allow politics in Europe and the U.S. to "settle a bit" and then reassess the situation. Another key piece to this is Ukraine's security anchor to the West. Most favor NATO membership for Ukraine, but O'Hanlon thinks that might be untenable. Instead, O'Hanlon proposes an entirely new security arrangement. The key is to be realistic about how the war will end and what can be achieved. "NATO leaders owe increasingly skeptical constituents a better answer to David Petraeus's famous question about Iraq: 'Tell me how this ends.'" Read the op-ed at TheHill.com. |
Welcome to The Hill's Views & Opinions newsletter, it's Tuesday, July 9. I'm Daniel Allott, bringing together a collection of key opinion pieces published from a wide range of voices. |
|
|
Op-eds exploring key issues affecting the U.S. and world: |
|
|
America's vulnerable global moment |
|
|
By Brahma Chellaney, author and geostrategist | For China, the longer the U.S. battles political malaise at home and stays distracted by conflicts elsewhere in the world, the better. |
| |
|
By Keith Naughton, political strategist |
The failure or unwillingness to raise Harris's profile by Biden's insular cabal could turn out to be accidentally brilliant — for Harris. But it only works if she is willing to throw them all under the bus, unapologetically. |
| |
|
By Thomas Gift, professor at University College London |
In that universe, Biden was never left without a clear heir apparent, the absence of which made staying in the 2024 race at age 81 seem like a good idea. As a consequence, Donald Trump never seemed likely for re-election. |
| |
|
By Elizabeth Robbins, retired Army officer |
The idea that hypothetical assassins would be shielded by presidential pardons is hyperbolic nonsense. A chief executive who boldly ordered such killings and then freed the assassins would be impeached and removed from office. Sotomayor's tortured scenario reads more like a bad movie script than a realistic appraisal of the American political dynamic. |
| |
|
Opinions related to pivotal issues and figures in the news: |
|
|
You're all caught up. See you next time! |
Views expressed by contributors are theirs and not the opinion of The Hill. Interested in submitting an op-ed? Click here. |
1625 K Street NW, 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20006 |
Copyright © 1998 - 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved. |
|
|
|
If you believe this has been sent to you in error, please safely unsubscribe.
No comments:
Post a Comment