LOCKOUT: The three media outlets banned from White House grounds on Friday are suing the Trump administration.
“This morning, we notified the government that we are filing a lawsuit today to protect our First Amendment rights and defend the principle that the government does not decide what the press reports or publishes,” CNN, MS NOW and Politico said in a joint statement on Monday.
“Without notice or process, the White House revoked our journalists’ credentials because it objected to our reporting,” they added. “Left unchallenged, this threatens press freedom and the public’s right to independent journalism free from government interference.”
All three outlets said Saturday that their journalists were denied access to the White House and had their credentials confiscated. Trump said he made the decision not because of any specific story or issue but as a "result of their constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS."
He said additional news outlets could be banned in the future.
The White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA), National Press Club and Knight First Amendment Institute all also denounced the administration's move.
"The American people, through a free and independent press, must be able to scrutinize those elected to power, regardless of whether government officials view it favorably," WHCA President Jacqui Heinrich said in a statement. "That’s why courts have repeatedly held that once the White House provides access to journalists, it cannot deny that access arbitrarily or based on the content of their reporting."
▪ The Hill: Wes Moore says Trump uses Constitution as ‘suggestion box.’
▪ Politico: Inside the White House media ban.
NEW ANGLE: Trump said a "top grade military complex" will be part of the triumphal arch bridging Washington, D.C., and Virginia, a change he said was made at the military's request for "National Security purposes."
Trump said on Truth Social that the complex will house snipers and drones on the roof and plaza areas.
The announcement comes as the arch, one of the president's beautification projects in the nation's capital, is facing a legal challenge from Vietnam War veterans, arguing the administration is seeking to move forward without requisite congressional approval.
The shift from Trump echoes a similar approach that his administration has taken with his White House ballroom project, arguing that it's necessary for security reasons.
If built, the arch would be 250 feet tall, running along the Arlington Memorial Bridge and across from Arlington National Cemetery.
▪ The Hill: FAA says arch will require ‘eternal flame’ to alert pilots.
▪ ABC News: Trump’s arch construction could run 20 hours a day.
DECISION TIME: Trump is raising the prospect that he could order a major offensive against Iran soon, suggesting "very big things" will happen in the "not-so-distant future."
Fox News's Trey Yingst reported that Trump is in a "deciding mode."
“The president described the current choices on the table as ‘wiping Iran out, letting them rot economically or making a deal,’” Yingst said. “He added, ‘My question is if and when do I blow the entire nation up? They better behave.’”
Trump previously told Axios that he's weighing whether to "go in and annihilate" the Iranian regime.
The president has mostly taken an approach of economic pressure in recent weeks to try to force Iranian leaders back to the negotiating table. The eruption of fighting between Saudi Arabia and the Houthi rebels in Yemen has threatened to pull the U.S. into a new front of the war.
Trump is reportedly expected to meet with six Persian Gulf leaders on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly this week. The administration is also allowing a "core delegation" of Iranian officials to attend the session in New York.
▪ The Hill: Kevin Hassett says Trump ‘had to act’ on Iran.
▪ Reuters: U.S., Iran trade threats after Houthi attacks escalate.
CLOSING IN: The Senate is looking to achieve final passage of a major college sports bill that would create national rules for athletes, coaches and the NCAA.
The Protect College Sports Act would enact several provisions to set regulations for the NCAA, including protecting the organization from antitrust lawsuits, establishing caps on revenue sharing and allowing schools to have retention funds for star players.
It would also require agents to register with a state before representing student-athletes, set a five-year window for athletic eligibility, and limit transfers and mid-season coaching moves.
The legislation has yielded opposition from the AFL-CIO, NAACP and the Congressional Black Caucus, but it advanced in the Senate comfortably, 74-24, last week.
As The Hill's Dominick Mastrangelo reports for Insider, the bill faces an uphill battle in the House when the lower chamber returns after the midterms.
▪ The Hill Insider: Attention shifts to Senate with House out of town.
No comments:
Post a Comment